Then you try to diagnose and try to run ipconfig from your command prompt and then you see something you had not seen in the past. You see a new interface such as this one:
Tunnel adapter Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:
What the heck is this?
This is required when the full iPv6 comes into existence. It probably came with the Window's update. I run Windows XP with SP2. When this [Tunnel adapter Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:] is seen your test for ipconfig /all shows this (some of the addresses have been tampered in the pasted result):
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Jay>ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hodentek
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Eth
ernet NIC
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx
Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.100
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : fe80::213:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx%4
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::2%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1
Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.101
Tunnel adapter Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF
Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : fe80::ffff:ffff:fffd%5
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
Tunnel adapter Automatic Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Automatic Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : xx-xx-xx-xx
Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : fe80::5efe:192.168.1.100%2
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::2%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
You may uninstall this feature, and there is extensive Microsoft Documentation for all sorts of Windows versions. The following command will uninstall this feature and will bring it back to how it used to be. After the command is run you will have to reboot for it to become effective.
C:\Documents and Settings\Jay>netsh
netsh>interface ipv6 uninstall
A reboot is required to complete this action.
2 comments:
One specialist in mail sphere said me about nice tool-repair outlook express windows 98,he said that tool is free,also it has many possibilities,also program restore corrupted messages, when other ways to do it are absent,recover all messages, contacts, address books and other items, that were stored in the files of dbx format,compatible with Windows 2003, Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista, Windows Me, Windows 98 and other supported versions of this operating system,can preview the messages, that were restored successfully,extract eml files, that can be restored without errors.
Whatever happens in similar situation always there is on example this tool-outlook express mail recovery software,it is free as far as I can see and has free status,utility is one of the easiest ways to retrieve your emails from damaged files with dbx extension,extracts messages in eml format only, these files will be extracted separately to any folder,can convert dbx files, supported by Outlook Express to eml format, that can be opened by other mail clients,software features an intuitive interface, that considerably facilitates the process,reliable program, that can protect your mailbox in dbx format against corruptions, resulting from incorrect user actions, virus attacks, network attacks and other failures.
Post a Comment